Skip to main content

Parks & Recreation



FERGUSON

A Ride In The Park? Residents Debate Proper Place For Bikes

By Tanya Parker, Post-Dispatch Special Correspondent

Residents of Ferguson are debating the proper place of bicycles and cyclists. A bill under consideration would allow police officers on patrol to ride bicycles in January-Wabash Park.

Currently, all cyclists are barred from the park. Some residents feel that this is a violation of their rights as taxpayers, who pay for public access and use of the park for recreation.

Alderman Greg Faupel, 3rd Ward, is considering sponsoring a bill to allow bikes and in-line skates in the park. He says children are especially restricted because they do not have a place to ride bikes safely. Faupel added that with police in the park, cycling would be controlled and would not become hazardous to pedestrians.

Maureen Damier, who lives on Lakeview Court, can see the park path from her kitchen window. She challenged Faupel to visit the park and consider the many elderly pedestrians and mothers with young children who use the path. Damier claims that the path is too narrow and hilly, and
that bikers would collide with  the city's liability.

While no immediate plans exist to allow bicycles and inline skates in the park, both are taken seriously in Ferguson. A group called Gateway Trailnet, which seeks to turn abandoned railway tracks into bike paths, is seeking a grant to develop a trail for Ferguson — linking it to other paths.


For serious cyclists like resident Martin Pion, the bicycle is a mode of transportation and a solution to air pollution. But Pion agrees that January-Wabash Park should be for the sole use of pedestrians. He measured some of the paths at just 4 feet wide, making them too narrow and dangerous for bicycles. However, Pion encouraged the city to observe its "share the road sign" ordinances.


photoferguson.jpg

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security Alarm in Rock Hill

ROCK HILL Alarm Works Well —Too Well, Says Owner By Tanya Parker Post-Dispatch Special Correspondent Frank Maridles, who operates a small business in Rock Hill, recently put in a new security alarm system, only to have it accidentally trip 12 times. Facing $800 in fines, he carne to the Board of Aldermen to appeal what he considers an exorbitant penalty for false alarms. Marides' request coincided with a financial report from Alderman Brad-ford L. Stevens, 3rd Ward, head of the finance committee for Rock Hill. Stevens reported that fines from false alarms had become an unexpected source of revenue for Rock Hill. He said the fines were meant to deter false alarms, not make money. Rock Hill waives the first two false alarms, then charges a fine ranging from $25 to $100. The ordinance applies to both residents and business owners. Stevens said false alarms had increased to 280 incidents in the past year, when residents or employees were in the buildings. Mayor Kenna...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hooters Plan is Defended, Criticized

FLORISSANT Hooters Plan is Defended, Criticized 'Harmful Messages,' Traffic Risk Balanced Against Economic Gain By Tanya Parker, Post-Dispatch Special Correspondent The Florissant City Council listened Monday night to impassioned arguments on both sides of a proposal for Hooters, a restaurant planned in the Florissant Oaks Shopping Center at Lindbergh Boulevard and Patterson Road. Opponents in the standing-room-only crowd at the council meeting said that waitresses at Hooters wore scanty clothing and were hired because of their appearance. Harold Hendrick, a talk-show host on KSIV Radio, represented the Florissant Citizen League at the meeting and urged the council to oppose discrimination against women "who have the wrong dimensions and the wrong appearance." Elizabeth Perkins, a resident of Florissant, said that Hooters sent harmful "messages to our society about women. Other people said they were worried about customers of Hooters who ...
Post a Comment
Read more